EVA WAS EERST moon landings - moonbase - NASA - Armstrong - lights on the moon - tunnels on the moon - alien technology on the moon - Isis mother goddess - Richard Bransom ad ad 1 0 2009-04-08T09:13:00Z 2009-04-08T09:13:00Z 1 2132 11730 97 27 13835 11.8107

 

 

The moon: an enigma

 

 

Moon landings

 

We are not going to dwell on the space race. Fact is that Americans thanks to operation Paperclip got a lot of advantage and that the more time went by they realized that on the moon they could find something so incredible that the finders would be upper mighty. Kennedy knew it too. He realized that extraterrestrial knowledge would erase all envy between intelligent, or better, gifted people (like him). All over the world gifted people would realize that materialism, egocentrism and jealousy was not worth time or trouble. Because thanks to the moon landings and the unequivocal extraterrestrial knowledge all became clear. Prophets and religions were apparently not so far from the truth. People have to love each other. Materialism and egocentrism are inferior traits belonging to life on planets like earth. Planets where life have to struggle the fight of the fittest.

 

Problem of course: only three percent of all people are gifted. Less gifted people would probably not care about spiritual knowledge. In any case, we don't believe that agression would diminish when people should know the truth about our origin. In other words: The struggle will still go on for a long time, with or without moon-knowledge ...

 

Some say in plain cold war Kennedy even made a proposal to cooperate with Soviets to land on the moon. Only ... some forces concluded he didn’t followed the rules as they made them.

 

So maybe there was cooperation, or maybe not … but what they found on the moon is in the hands of the real leaders of this planet. That’s where we're convinced of.

 

The moon was a no brainer in 50’s and 60’s. Space exploration needed the moon. A moonbase was of course the most necessary. Plans were made many years before the first moon landing. After the moonbase Mars would follow soon ...

 

Apollo’s landed on the moon … it was an immense success.

 

 

But the Apollo program stopped. Why?

 

- Safety issues were not the reason.

 

With all kinds of respect: only a few people died. Thousands are dying in car and other accidents, by murder, war etc. Technical means were enough tested. Before Apollo 11 there were 65 missions to the moon accomplished. So technical means were not so bad at all.

 

 

- Health concerns for astronauts?

 

Don’t think so. Men who reached the moon mostly are in great condition after more than 40 years. We could give many examples ten times less important than a moonbase where health concerns were no issue (from wars to the tests of useless medicines).

 

And why they are now preparing a marsbase? Where is the so long expected and necessary moonbase? Note that every important man forty years ago stressed that there would be a moonbase in a few years after the first moon landing.

 

 

Something a little out of the context but we must say it

 

Why one of the greatest Americans (Neil Armstrong) is buried at sea? Because he wanted that? And why he wanted that? He was a humble man. But not so humble as they made us believe. He fought in the Korean war and was very pleased with all the decorations he got. Armstrong carried a great secret upon his shoulders and he was persuaded not to tell his secret to the world. But he was a tormented man. He probably decided: 'I don't deserve the honor they would give me after death. Nor my grave will be a place of pilgrimage. All in all I cheated humanity.' Although we think he did the right thing.

 

Also beside: the twelve apostles that walked the moon have said things we are not going to repeat but which should open our eyes. Astronauts are screened by all means … they swore precious oaths of secrecy, especially about the moon. But some behaved very strange after the moon landings. As if they had realized where the real origin of mankind lies.

 

 

- Was money shortage the reason?

 

No. Governments, banks and private investors worldwide have thrown masses of money out of the windows and that during forty years. They dumped their money in every thinkable project but for the moon landings there was nothing left? Come on. And don’t believe that a moon landing is not safe or costs -let's say- a hundred billion of dollars. That is simply a lie. Besides private investigators are now planning moon trips for a fraction of what NASA has made us believe a moon landing costs. Richard Bransom, Elon Musk etcetera ... if they should be allowed by the real rulers they already would have walked on the moon. They are great men but oh so tiny bunnies compared to the real powerfull men. Bransom and others have plans to explore space, make tourist tours in space, build hotels, and yes they plan to visit the moon. But be sure they will encounter lots of 'misfortune' on their way. Besides: visiting the moon? It would be under extreme supervision of the real rulers. And we are not sure if Bransom with his rebellious image will accept that. Visiting the moon will not happen with him in pole position, if you ask us.

 

Private missions –if they ever will be allowed- will be followed very closely by the real rulers. Real rulers are infiltrated everywhere, also in NASA. But NASA is not so important with her peanuts budget. Michael Douglas Griffin, a NASA boss and a great man, probably said once too much that the greatest mistake America made was not to have a moonbase for twenty or more years. He got fired.

 

Michael Griffin is NOT a member of the real rulers ... you can be sure about that.

 

Robert Shapiro (University of New York), also a great man, once said (we paraphrase) that a moonbase would be a gift to humanity. One can scan space to detect and divert comets. And as a bonus, a moonbase offers an extra survival chance for humans, as they shoot and miss and a real big one hits earth.

 

 

- Was a lack of popularity the reason?

 

Lack of popularity was almost ten years after the space flight of Tereshkova one of the reasons for the termination of the Apollo project. People no longer took for granted they had spent too much tax money. Why the real rulers did no real effort to stir up interest of the people? Only God knows. One woman (poor thing) on the moon would have boosted popularity in a manner never seen before. But, incredible but true, NASA left astronauts dancing, singing, playing golf ... and make embarrassing movements on the moon, like as it were clowns -a strange kind of apostles if you ask us-. Clowns only stupid tax payers could laugh with. The average citizen didn’t laugh. It was their money they were playing with.

 

Why NASA did let those things happen?

 

Actually, it appears popularity had to go down instead of up ... The lower the popularity, the easier one could end the Apollo project and send the moonbase to the Greek calendar.

 

Later they dispatched golden messages in space. Again wasted tax money …

 

Why NASA has send LP records and a signpost to earth into space? If aliens would find it, they could come to visit us ... and destroy us. Why NASA took that risk? Even if it takes 10.000 years or more (in evolutionary times a short period) it would be a crime to put future generations at risk.

 

The only credible answer: The real rulers are sure no alien will ever be found. Because there are no aliens anymore on the planet our soul is coming from. The extraterrestrials that still exist are not those who visited us in the past. They are living in a galaxy too far away. No, if you ask us, those disks and signposts were meant to take popularity for future moon landings down.

 

If we are wrong ... a message to the aliens: We still have an old LP player. You can buy it for a real good price.

 

And do you really think the SETI project is looking for intelligent life? Off course not, The Seti leaders are no criminals. Because a crime that could destroy all humans on earth does never expire, even not after 10.000 years. Or do you think that sending radio signals to extraterrestrials who could destroy earth is not a crime?

 

Seti is looking for comets or maybe for some celestial bodies.

 

If the real rulers are not sponsoring the project, they surely are not against it. They know Seti never will find intelligent life, but it's helping them to scan space to find dangerous comets ... a great help.

 

By the way, we don't rule out a few blinded coworkers believe they will find intelligent life, but they are being misled (that's -again- our personal meaning).

 

 

Tunnels and caves on the moon

 

You probably know the moon is full of tunnels and caves. Tunnels and caves -some are immense- could be a perfect moonbase. Also for our ancient creators. And we are almost sure that astronauts found some of the bases. They knew where to look. Besides it’s relatively easy to find a tunnel or a cave. Temperature above such a tunnel or cave betrays it’s presence.

Yes we think our real rulers have one or more secret moonbases they are using to protect us from incoming comets etc. For a little more explanation you have to read our site (especially the Tesla related articles we are linking at).

 

 

The prestige hoax

 

It's incredible that many of us today believe that the space race had everything to do with prestige. And it's remarkable that one now says that with the first man on the moon the race was over, while all prior statements revealed the moonbase was the goal. It was the absolutely necessary step for all further developments.

 

One of the many examples that prove the determination: June 1969: Prototypes of the NERVA Motors run at full speed. Cheering on all seats. The purpose of the incredibly powerful nuclear rocket engines was clear: 'First the moon, and within 15 years we visit Mars.' September 1969: A study group around president Nixon confirms the plans for a trip to Mars. Doubt is nowhere to be found.

 

Until suddenly the Americans nose became to bleed. ‘We never have taken a moonbase and a journey to Mars seriously.' Now that we have won the race, we can better use our money for something else.'

 

If that was no lie, we still will eat our shoe ...

 

Everyone, of course, may have his own thoughts, but someone has to tell them that stopping manned moon landing had nothing to do with money, prestige and safety. Vasily Mishin, who in 1966 after the death of his mentor Korolev had taken over leadership of the Sovjet missions: 'I don't understand it, we were so close!' If he was speaking the truth, he was certainly no real leader of this world. The reason for the Soviets to stop: 'We have not won the race. We can use our money for other things.'

 

One shoe is enough.

 

For those who don't see our message: The moon landings were stopped because the mother of all conspiracy is right: we are genetically engineered apes.

 

Alien technology has to stay in the hands of the real rulers. Without them the world would be much worse than it is now. The discovery made them more humble than you think. A disclosure would break down all religions, the power they carry with them, and the millions of people who are leaning upon them. A disclosure would end in a run for extra terrestrial technology and power. There would be a complete chaos on earth.

 

 

What if the moon is what we think she is?

 

Then she a Jack of all trades, a Deus ex machina, a super solution, part of a plan maybe not so simple for our creators to execute but oh so efficient. Then she's used to change live on earth, she could be used as a launch pad for rockets to divert incoming comets, a launch pad for spacecraft to go to other planets, a place where our creators left signs of their existence, where they left us technology, knowledge ... a place where human consciousness could survive if on earth takes place a catastrophe that could wipe out humanity in spite of all superior things our creators left us on the moon and that should protect us ... (maybe you can finish the list).

A little less important anecdote (august 2014): through google earth spotters saw a human walking on the moon. First google earth seems to us not to be the source for the moons' exploration. But we should not be surprised if our creators left a gigantic human statue on the moon, just as an extra reminder for their existence.

 

 

Why no other super power putted feet up the moon?

 

Surprisingly Europe or China -not to mention the Russians again- have not taken over the helm of the Americans. If they really would have wanted it, they would have had a man on the moon a long time ago. Their manifestation of power would be sky high. Overthrowing Americans, is every world leader's dream.

 

Here also anyone can think what he wants, but the real rulers will never allow another superpower to send a manned mission to the moon. Not without them in the drivers seat (or behind it).

 

 

The rabbit in the hat

 

Up to the marsbase.

 

Costly studies will demonstrate that a marsbase makes a moonbase no priority. Very good seen by our real rulers. So one will stop complaining about a moonbase. That we should have had luxury lodgings on the moon already -based on plans from 1969- they let us forget.

 

Screening of the Martian surface goes on for a while yet, because you never know. But it seems to look good. Signals from the media are positive. Maybe a lot of scientists will have difficulty to understand why the moon is suddenly of so little importance. So one rabbit may not be enough. But then again maybe our real rulers have had enough time to take some precautions. Maybe they cleaned up the moon or they have located ‘safe heavens’ on the moon. We don’t know for sure off course.

 

One thing is for sure: those who will candidate for president or leader of a great organization should keep their mouth shut about a moonbase. At least still for some time to come. Media will make hot potatoes of them, and the citizens will follow.

 

 

Water and life

 

There’s a lot of water (in the form of ice) on the moon (regolith also is containing the elements to make water but that again is another story). No doubt about that ice for forty years. And where there is ice there could be life. Finding a primitive life form on the moon would make the cost of a manned moon trip a negligible factor.

 

 

Freemasons (they cannot be absent) and Isis

 

A lot of astronauts, are freemasons or they have links with them through family.

 

On the Moon, Aldrin and Armstrong honored Isis (and Osiris). Isis, a name that stands for the greatest goddess ever walked on this earth (and on the moon). (We think Osiris was just used for window dressing, because men in a lower position than a woman -even in this times- is not an evidence.) Isis had wings in a lot of old sculptures and pictures. She has descended from heaven, gave mankind secret knowledge, was good and righteous, had a pure soul. She gave us her consciousness (the ankh cross). Isis was the goddess, the source of wisdom of the Egyptian priests, who were the teachers of some of the greatest men ever lived (Socrates, Plato, Jesus ...). She realized the most significant concept of most religions: the resurrection. Resurrection after wiping out the sins of mankind. That sounds familiar.

 

If you think about it you'll notice in the chapter 'Spaceship Moon' that the resurrection is nothing more that the rebirth of mankind after all sins were wiped out and after Jesus (Isis) gave His (Her) life for it. So it's probably a much more realistic issue than most of you may think.

 

Only, Isis was there long before Jesus.

 

And if you ask us: there were a lot of Isises around the world because according to Plato and according to the Egyptian priests the so called gods and the so called mother goddesses were present in a lot of important (holy) places of this planet. Only they were given a different name than Isis, but that's not important. [We have to use logical reasoning because Plato was a great man but he was afraid of the authorities and had to place men above women. Although he took an extremely progressive stance about women, he didn't cross the line. He knew what happened to his mentor.]

 

Isis is a holy name to the real rulers of this world. So it's not a coincidence the first astronauts paid tribute to her. Though NASA told us a little lie: 'The tribute was a personal initiative of the astronauts.'

 

[Off the record (updated 5-8-2014): a terrorist organization that calls himself ISIS? It looks like Obama doesn't liked that: he said ISIL. And sometimes for some reason it was IS. We have our doubts but the name ISIS seems like a provocation here. Although the real leaders know what's going on, only we don't. If we appear to be paranoid to you, don't bother, because all we write we see as a hobby and a little incitement for all those who seem to live their life in superficiality and trivial egocentrism.]

 

Paranormal experiments on the moon? Hard to deny, since top leaders have admitted it. 'But they were a personal initiative.'

 

The ambitious first words (giant leap)? 'A personal initiative'

 

Luminous bulbs? 'Space debris'

 

Consciousness problems? ‘Hallucinations’.

 

All according to NASA.

 

Yeah yeah …

 

 

A shocking truth?

 

If earth -long ago- has received visit from an alien civilization than there is evidence on the moon.

 

It looks like scholars are afraid to speak out this statement. Individuals including Ian Crawford from Birkbeck College (University of London) had a few tricky questions, but the reply of his colleagues consisted of a deafening silence.

 

Who has an open mind, cannot ignore the possibility that earth ever had an alien visit. It is short-sighted to assume that men will discover alien intelligence within, say, 5000 years and at the same time reject the possibility that the earth was visited in the past by that same intelligent life. Moreover, it would be the most normal thing in the world as those visitors first landed on the sterile and safe moon, far away from viruses, bacteria and any other obstacles that could threaten them on earth.

 

However, the moon has practically no atmosphere. So all traces, even these of millions of years old, remain untouched (or almost untouched because there are meteorites and sort of space weather we are not going to discuss).

 

 

Armstrong the sad hero

 

Anyone committed with the subject knows the rumors that especially Armstrong was overthrown with what he saw on the moon. Communication with the outside world became interrupted. Nonetheless, some specialized radio amateurs have taken care of the conversations. According to those intercepted messages -later also according to confidential statements of initiates- Armstrong on the moon, has seen a strange light. And as if that wasn't enough: Near the landing module there were space ships that clearly were from an alien civilization.

 

All in all not so crazy, because if alien visitors ever landed on the moon or later on earth, they surely came not by feet. And they must have left a few space ships on the moon (on earth too, but one of them crashed by a salvage operation near Roswell).

 

 

Witnesses?

 

A lot! But without credentials. And guess why they lost credibility?

 

Maurice Chatelain worked for twenty years at NASA as a communication expert and had very good contacts. He was involved in the preparation of the moon landings and stated publicly several times that he knew first-hand that Armstrong on the moon saw alien space craft. Because he came to believe in UFOs -one would for less- and later wrote books about UFO’s, he was portrayed as a freak. His reputation shrank to zero.

 

Cartner, Reagan, Irwin, Mitchell etc etc ... they believed (believe) in aliens. Men too great to make ridiculous. So real rulers let the media do a subtle job (we hear and see believers and non believers ... and a lot of doubt). Reagan died in 2004. He was one of the greatest. But some will attribute him a low IQ, a henpecked husband etc. etc ...

 

Sorry for the etc etc ... but we still have so much to say while we are sure only a few of you will believe us (a sad thing) ... But then again, lucky us ... We don't care. We only hope you will respect our meaning, just like we will respect yours.

 

 

Chinese moon landings

 

Shortly said: They happen with permission of the real rulers of this world.

 

We don’t update our site like we should do, because we have so many other things in mind, and our belief will find it’s way. It's a belief, you know that already, so we don't speak in capitals, but we would not be surprised if sooner or later our belief will be seen as the truth.

 

Don’t talk us about Chinese who will take over world space program. They act and speak like some American presidents in the past (and present). 'In a few years we will be walking on the moon’. Or: ‘In ten years we will have a moonbase’. Those words we heard so many times before.

 

But when time goes by: ‘We are in the middle of a financial crisis, our moon landing program cannot go on’.

 

After a boom there always comes a crisis. During a boom you make a promise you know you cannot hold. So during a crisis you recall that promise. Simple but efficient. People have other things in mind than a moon landing in the middle of a financial crisis.

 

By the way: There are some Chinese too that belong to the real rulers of this world. Nasa leaders, presidents, and some media are no more than lightning rods, they are out of real business. Besides,

 

Did you notice how far Chinese December 2013 lunar mission landed from American sites? .

 

 

Next

Some chapters are translated (red dot)